In the heyday of the five year plans in Pakistan, the common expressions for the officials dealing with the economy and their institutional affiliations were “planners” and “planning machinery.” The fiscal crisis of the state and the consequent installation of regimes of stabilization, structural adjustment and reform gave birth to usages such as “economic manager,” “economic management” and “economic team.” It has also marked a shift from the long and medium-term to the near-and short-term. This paper, however, adheres to the broader view of the management of the economy and its institutions taken by Anmad and Amjad in the eighties. According to them, “National economic management is a new but growing science. The developing world's experience of the recent decades underlines the fact that economic and social progress is an induced process. Governments are not only called upon to initiate the development process but are also required to influence its composition, pace, tone, and direction through an appropriate policy-mix. A consistent framework encompassing various policies within the bounds of an overall national strategy needs to be worked out by the national policy-makers.” These authors also pointed out that there was a gap between the increasing requirements of management and the capabilities of individuals and institutions. “Economic management has thus become a critical area for study as well as introspection.”1